DRugwatch BlogRSS 2.0

DRugwatch Blog > March 2012 > Lexapro: The End of an Era

Lexapro: The End of an Era

Natalie TaylorContributor: Natalie Taylor, Ph.D.

Mylan announced yesterday that the company has launched the first generic version of escitalopram (Forest Laboratories’ Lexapro, Lundbeck’s Cipralex/Seroplex). Under an agreement with Forest, Mylan will exclusively be able to market its product until the pediatric exclusivity of Lexapro’s patent expires in mid-March 2012. The launch of generic escitalopram marks the end of an era for branded selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants.

The FDA’s approval of Eli Lilly’s Prozac (fluoxetine), the first SSRI to reach the U.S. market, sparked a complete overhaul of the way that major depressive disorder (MDD) was treated. Up until Prozac became available in early 1988, MDD was managed primarily with tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors—drugs that carried a myriad of significant and life-threatening side effects, not to mention the potential for causing fatal dietary and drug interactions. Due to its superior safety and tolerability over older antidepressants, Prozac rapidly became the preferred first-line antidepressant for MDD, earning an impressive $350 million in the United States within its first year on the market. It was quickly followed by four “me-too” SSRIs: sertraline [Pfizer’s Zoloft/Lustral/Besitran], paroxetine [GlaxoSmithKline’s Paxil/Seroxat], citalopram [Forest Laboratories’ Celexa, Lundbeck’s Cipramil/Seropram], and finally escitalopram--the last SSRI to reach the U.S. market in 2002.

Forest Laboratories and Lundbeck at once were faced with the significant challenge of promoting Lexapro in a market that was nearly saturated with well-established SSRIs. Additionally, escitalopram was the (S)-enantiomer of citalopram, leading to speculation that the product was merely a marketing ploy by the companies and carried no significant clinical benefits over the racemic version of the drug. However, Forest and Lundbeck were able to overcome these sentiments by conducting and publishing a multitude of post-marketing clinical trials of escitalopram in MDD and other psychiatric indications. When marketing the drug to physicians, Forest and Lundbeck highlighted in vivo data, secondary data points, and post-hoc analyses from human and animal studies comparing escitalopram to citalopram, sertraline, venlafaxine, and paroxetine. By doing so, the company effectively communicated to physicians that escitalopram was safer, more tolerable, more selective for the serotonin transporter, and even could offer superior efficacy over its competitors—despite escitalopram’s close similarities to other SSRIs. These fierce promotional efforts, combined with the gradual loss of market exclusivity of the other SSRIs, led escitalopram to become the highest-selling product for the treatment of unipolar depression (i.e., MDD, minor depression, and dysthymia). In 2010, we estimate the product garnered $2.1 billion in the seven major pharmaceutical markets, representing almost 18% of sales alone in the $11.6 billion unipolar depression market.

Generic versions of escitalopram will substantially boost revenue for Mylan, Teva, and other generic drug manufacturers. Teva had previously attempted to launch its generic version of Lexapro in 2006, when it challenged the validity of Forest’s patent for the product in a paragraph IV filing. However, the U.S. District Court of the District of Delaware, and later, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in favor of Forest, putting a halt to Teva’s ambitions.

It is unlikely that the peak-year sales of more recently launched antidepressants in the United States, such as Pfizer’s Pristiq (desvenlafaxine) and Forest’s Viibryd (vilazodone), will ever approach those of escitalopram. And given the developmental pipeline for unipolar depression disorders, it is even more unlikely that any emerging therapy will dislodge the now-genericized SSRIs as first-line treatment choices for MDD during the next decade. Decision Resources forecasts that by 2015, the sales of Forest and Lundbeck’s branded escitalopram for the treatment of unipolar depression will fall to $329 million. Indeed, the arrival of generic escitalopram marks the end of an important era in psychopharmacology—one which ultimately revolutionized the treatment of MDD.
Posted on: 3/1/2012 7:44:50 PM | with 0 comments


Tags: Central Nervous System, Natalie Taylor

Trackback URL: http://decisionresources.com/trackback/93235120-b8f5-4fdd-8cea-db0a44fb939c/Lexapro--The-End-of-an-Era.aspx?culture=en-us

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment Subscribe



What is the abbreviation for Accountable Care Organization?

 

rss twitter linkedin

 

DRugwatch Blog

Quick insight on intriguing drug market developments from Decision Resources’ analysts.

Recent posts

Post title:
FDA Approval for The Medicines Company’s Intravenous Antiplatelet Kengreal
Post date:
6/23/2015 1:22:54 PM
Post Summary:
Conor WalshContributors: Conor Walsh, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Topics: Cardiovascular

On June 22nd, 2015 the U.S. FDA approved Kengreal (cangrelor), the Medicines Company’s intravenous antiplatelet drug for use “as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for reducing the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stent thrombosis in patients in who have not been treated with a P2Y12 platelet inhibitor and are not being given a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor.”

Post title:
Hematological Malignancies: Are Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Checking-in?
Post date:
6/17/2015 9:32:42 AM
Post Summary:
Contributor: Dana Gheorghe, Ph.D
Topics
: Conference Commentary, Oncology


Recent years have seen an added emphasis on the relationship between cancer and the activity of the immune system. Novel agents that aim to harness the immune system have already been approved in the U.S. for solid tumors (Bristol-Myers Squibb/Ono Pharmaceutical’s Opdivo [nivolumab] for NSCLC and malignant melanoma, and Merck & Co.’s Keytruda [pembrolizumab] for malignant melanoma), and are in development for a plethora of other oncology indications. Most of the development has been targeted towards solid tumors, but the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hematological malignancies is becoming increasingly evident.

Post title:
Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Answer Long-Asked Questions – But New Questions Arise
Post date:
6/12/2015 10:26:05 AM
Post Summary:
Contributor: Eamonn O'Connor, Ph.D.

The recent American Diabetes Association’s 75th Scientific Sessions in Boston saw the release of data from the ELIXA cardiovascular outcomes trial (CVOT) for lixisenatide (Sanofi/Zealand Pharma’s Lyxumia), the first such trial completed for the GLP-1 receptor agonist drug class. However, it was the publication of the data from the CVOT for sitagliptin (Merck’s Januvia/Ono’s Glactiv), known as TECOS1, that was most eagerly anticipated; this is because the previous CVOTs for saxagliptin (AstraZeneca’s Onglyza) and alogliptin (Takeda/Furiex’s Nesina/Vipidia) had raised significant concerns about a potential risk for increased rates of hospitalization due to heart failure. The results from TECOS therefore, were viewed as pivotal as to whether this risk was a feature specific to the DPP-IV inhibitor drug class.

Post title:
Malignant Melanoma: Evolving Standards of Care
Post date:
6/5/2015 2:52:20 PM
Post Summary:
Contributor: Natalia Reoutova, M.Sc.
Topics: Conference Commentary, Oncology

The past five years have seen unprecedented progress in the treatment of malignant melanoma, which translated into approval of highly efficacious immunotherapies, targeted small-molecule therapies, and several combination regimens.

Post title:
Dual Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Oncology: Ready for Prime Time?
Post date:
6/3/2015 4:22:51 PM
Post Summary:
Contributor: Khurram Nawaz, M.Sc.
Topics: Conference Commentary, Oncology

The 2015 ASCO annual meeting promised to be packed with new and exciting data on cancer immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, therapeutic vaccines, and T-cell therapies (to name a few examples). The meeting has certainly lived up to our expectations—with a few surprises along the way.

Decision Resources Group brands include: