DRugwatch BlogRSS 2.0

DRugwatch Blog > June 2011 > With Results From the ARISTOTLE Trial on the Horizon, What Are Eliquis’s Prospects for Success in th

With Results From the ARISTOTLE Trial on the Horizon, What Are Eliquis’s Prospects for Success in the Atrial Fibrillation Market?

Matt KileenWritten by: Matthew Killeen, Ph.D.

Summary
The stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation (SPAF) drug market is witnessing a sea change. Following the much welcomed launch of Pradaxa (Boehringer Ingelheim’s dabigatran etexilate) in the U.S. in October 2010, and the presentation of data from Xarelto’s (Bayer/J&J’s rivaroxaban) ROCKET-AF study, in November 2010, physicians are eagerly awaiting the results from Eliquis’s (BMS/Pfizer’s apixaban) Phase III ARISTOTLE trial. Although Eliquis is expected to be the third of the new oral anticoagulants to launch for this increasingly lucrative indication, will its profile and clinical performance enable it to gain a foothold in this market?

Analysis
Eliquis has undergone a unique clinical development program for SPAF. Its first Phase III study, the AVERROES trial, compared the drug to aspirin for stroke prevention in patients who were unable or unwilling to take warfarin. Based on Eliquis’s clearly superior efficacy over aspirin, seen in an interim analysis, AVERROES was prematurely terminated and its positive results were presented in August 2010 at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) conference. While experts interviewed by Decision Resources welcomed new Phase III data for another replacement to warfarin, Eliquis’s superiority over aspirin was seen as no great surprise (in the ACTIVE-W SPAF trial, for example, warfarin clearly out performed a combination of aspirin and Plavix).

Eliquis’s bleeding profile in AVERROES garnered a great deal of attention from experts that we interviewed – the rates of major bleeding were not significantly different between Eliquis and aspirin – and we believe that this is one area where it has the greatest potential to differentiate itself from rival drugs (Pradaxa and Xarelto were both shown to have comparable rates of bleeding to warfarin in their Phase III trials). Indeed new results from Eliquis’s Phase II SPAF trial in Japanese patients (the ARISTOTLE-J Study), published last week, revealed that the drug was associated with a reduced rate of major or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin (1.4% vs. 5.3%). Although these data are encouraging, the overall rates of bleeding with both drugs were vey low in this small 222 patient study. A true measure of Eliquis’s safety and efficacy, relative to warfarin, will be provided from the pivotal Phase III ARISTOTLE trial, results from which are expected later this year. Based on currently available data, and thought leader insight, what are some likely outcomes from ARISTOTLE?

We expect Eliquis to have similar efficacy to warfarin in ARISTOTLE alongside a stronger safety profile. At the very least, we expect the drug to have a significantly reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhage, relative to warfarin, as has already been seen with Pradaxa and Xarelto. We also expect that Eliquis has the potential to show a trend towards lower rates of major bleeding in ARISTOTLE; a statistically significantly reduction in this endpoint, however, will be much tougher to achieve.

We predict a first launch for Eliquis in 2012 for SPAF. Eliquis is therefore likely to enter the market behind Pradaxa and Xarelto and, although these prior launches may further prime physicians to the concept of new oral agents to replace warfarin, overcoming these more established brands will be no simple feat. Alongside its first-to-market advantage, for example, Pradaxa was shown to have superior efficacy over warfarin in its Phase III trial (Xarelto, on the other hand, had a similar level of efficacy to warfarin in its study). Finally, as with Pradaxa, Eliquis is dosed twice daily and any advantages that it could offer in terms of lower rates of bleeding could be offset by this dosing requirement. Given the expected long treatment durations with the new anticoagulants for SPAF, a once daily drug, such as Xarelto, may well emerge as the preferred choice.



Posted on: 6/21/2011 1:04:12 PM | with 0 comments


Tags: Cardiovascular, Matt Killeen

Trackback URL: http://decisionresources.com/trackback/abf59c5a-9789-4f35-bac0-522e477a5852/With-Results-From-the-ARISTOTLE-Trial-on-the-Horizon,-What-Are-Eliquis’s-Prospects-for-Success-in-th.aspx?culture=en-us

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment Subscribe



What is the abbreviation for Accountable Care Organization?

 

rss twitter linkedin

 

DRugwatch Blog

Quick insight on intriguing drug market developments from Decision Resources’ analysts.

Recent posts

Post title:
Next Steps for Vorapaxar: EU PAD Label and Antidote Development?
Post date:
2/17/2015 10:49:37 AM
Post Summary:

Stefanie Matlok Graeme GreeneWriiten by: Stefanie Hoffart and Graeme Green

Topic: Cardiovascular

On January 19, 2015, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the thrombin receptor antagonist vorapaxar (Merck’s Zontivity) for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), co-administered with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and, if necessary, clopidogrel.


Post title:
Bococizumab: Late to Great? Dyslipidemia Déjà vu?
Post date:
2/12/2015 3:58:28 PM
Post Summary:
Tim BlackstockContributor: Tim Blackstock
Topics: Cardiovascular

The link between high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular (CV) risk is well established, as is, the evidence showing that agents that reduce LDL-C can prevent CV events.

Post title:
Sandoz’s Biosimilar Filgrastim Scores Positive Recommendation from FDA Advisory Committee
Post date:
1/22/2015 3:44:26 PM
Post Summary:
Contributors: Anees Malik and Hristina Ivanova

The unanimous recommendation by the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) for FDA approval of Sandoz’s biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006; Zarxio)–the first biosimilar filing to be accepted in the United States– moves the biosimilar product tantalizingly close to FDA approval. Oncology, Biosimilars, “Anees Malik”, “Hristina Ivanova”

Post title:
AstraZeneca’s Brilinta Meets Primary End Point in PEGASUS-TIM 54 Study
Post date:
1/15/2015 4:53:03 PM
Post Summary:
Conor WalshContributor: Conor Walsh

AstraZeneca yesterday (January 14, 2015) announced that the Phase III PEGASUS-TIMI 54 study—a large-scale outcomes trial involving over 21,000 post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients—successfully met its primary efficacy end point. The company also reported that preliminary analysis did not reveal any unexpected safety issues. This study represents the first of several large studies that are set to complete over the next two years seeking to expand Brilinta’s (ticagrelor) label and drive sales growth.

Post title:
Cancer Drugs Funding in England is Flawed and Needs Reform
Post date:
1/14/2015 4:47:28 PM
Post Summary:

Contributor: Dan Roberts PhD

In 2011, the UK government introduced the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) in England, which funds cancer drugs which have not been deemed cost-effective or have not yet been assessed by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

Decision Resources Group brands include: