Pharmacor

December 2008

Bipolar Depression

Report Authors
Sandra T. Chow, M.Sc.
Yolanda Sutherland, M.P.H.
Amy K. Jassen, Ph.D.
Mollie Epstein, M.A.
  • Pages:170
  • Tables:29
  • Figures:7
  • Citations:198
  • Drugs:40
  • Interviews:35

Introduction:

Depression plays a prominent role in bipolar disorder as the most frequent, and usually the presenting, symptom of the disorder. Since we last reported on the market for bipolar depression, only a single drug, quetiapine/quetiapine XR (AstraZeneca’s Seroquel/Seroquel XR), has received approval to treat bipolar depression, for a total of two. At the same time, our report has expanded the epidemiological definition of bipolar disorder to include more mildly afflicted cases of the disorder—subthreshold bipolar disorder—and expanded the bipolar disorder population and, consequently, the bipolar depression population.

Questions Answered in This Report:

  *   Expert consensus is that bipolar depression should be treated differently than unipolar depression. How are cases of bipolar depression managed? To what extent are bipolar depressives mistaken for, and mistreated as, unipolar depressives? Which agents are perceived as safe and effective in bipolar depression?

  *   High-priced atypical antipsychotics have been approved for bipolar mania and as adjuncts to mood-stabilizing drugs in the treatment of bipolar disorder. These indications have proven to be lucrative line extensions for these schizophrenia drugs. To what extent has sales in bipolar depression contributed to these drugs’ sales?  How valuable is a label for bipolar depression? In which markets is a regulatory label for bipolar depression possible? To what extent will psychiatrists use an unlabeled agent in bipolar depression? Which of the atypical antipsychotics is favored in each market and why?

  *   Numerous branded agents will face generic competition in the next two years. Will the bipolar depression pipeline sustain the multibillion-dollar market in the face of generics competition? Which companies are poised to seize the opportunity left by the critical need for more drugs approved to treat bipolar depression?

  *   Few drugs are seeking approval for bipolar depression, some with a novel mechanism of action. How will physicians accept these novel mechanisms of action? Will emerging drugs with similar mechanisms of action to current agents be able to differentiate themselves?

Scope:

Markets covered: United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, Japan.

Primary research: 35 country-specific interviews with thought-leading psychiatrists.

Epidemiology:  Lifetime prevalence of bipolar disorder; 12-month prevalence of major depressive episodes among lifetime cases of bipolar disorder, segmented by bipolar I, bipolar II, and subthreshold bipolar disorder.

Emerging therapies: Phase II: 3 drugs; Phase III: 2 drugs; Coverage of 10 other emerging therapies with potential to impact the bipolar depression market.

Market forecast features: We provide an in-depth examination of the current and future bipolar depression market performance over a ten-year forecast period (2007-2017), taking into account several anticipated new product launches and future subpopulation approvals. Using a proprietary generic erosion model, we also forecast the effect of generics launches for current and emerging therapies on the U.S. and European markets through 2017.

Search Reports

Mentioned in this report:

  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Arcturus Pharmaceutical
  • Asahi Kasei
  • Astellas Pharma
  • AstraZeneca
  • bioMérieux
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Cephalon
  • Corcept Therapeutics
  • Eli Lilly
  • Forest Laboratories
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Janssen Pharmaceutica
  • Kyowa Hakko Kirin
  • Lundbeck
  • Meiji Seika Kaisha
  • Mochida Pharmaceutical
  • NeuroSearch
  • Novartis
  • Ortho-McNeil
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  • Pfizer
  • Pierre Fabre
  • Repligen
  • Sanofi-Aventis
  • Servier
  • Solvay Pharmaceuticals
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • Tikvah Therapeutics
  • Vanda Pharmaceuticals
  • Wyeth